Legal Opinion

Partee v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1925No. 16160PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

1. A petition for certiorari which contains no proper assignment of error is void. Citizens Banking Co. v. Paris, 119 Ga. 517, 518 (46 S. E. 638).(a) Such a petition should not be sanctioned; but, if sanctioned, should *695be dismissed on tlie hearing. The same result is reached, however, where the petition is overruled. See, in this connection, Flynn v. City of East Point, 18 Ga. App. 729 (90 S. E. 374), and citations.

Decided April 15, 1925. J. II. Fellcer, for plaintiff in error.

2. In the instant ease the only attempted assignment of error in the petition for certiorari was in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens Banking Co. v. ParisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Flynn v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Harrell v. City of QuitmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Hardison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richards v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Wood v. Fairfax Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API