Legal Opinion

Harrell v. City of Quitman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1915No. 6697PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari; from Brooks superior court — Judge Thomas. May term, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

A petition for certiorari, in which the only attempt to assign error Was in these words: “To which said judgment and sentence your petitioner excepts, and assigns the same as error,” does not comply with section 5183 of the Civil Code, which provides that a plaintiff in certiorari “shall plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of.” Citizens Banking Co. v. Parris, 119 Ga. 517 (46 S. E. 638); Edgeman v. Stewart, 141 Ga. 686 (81 S. E. 1036); Papworth v. Fitzgerald, 111 Ga. 54 (36 S. E. 311); Taft Co. v. Smith, 112 Ga. 196 (37 S. E. 424); Callaway v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 354 (64 S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Papworth v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Citizens Banking Co. v. ParisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Callaway v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Taft Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Birdford Supply Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chan v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Partee v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Davis v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Jennings v. City of QuitmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Newsome v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API