Legal Opinion
Pacific Wool Growers v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 3, 1940PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
This is a petition for mandamus to require the respondent to accept appointment as attorney for service of process for the petitioner, and also to accept and file its charter, by-laws and certain financial papers, together with a filing fee under the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 181. The petition was heard by a single justice upon the petition and answer, it being agreed that the facts set forth therein were true and that the sole question to be determined was whether the provisions of said c. 181 are applicable to the petitioner. The single justice ordered the petition dismissed, but…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Attorney General v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- National Fertilizer Co. v. Fall River Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Saltmarsh v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Atlantic & Gulf Maritime Region v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. ClubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- New England Medical Center Hospital, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- EMC Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.