Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 31, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00119Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION BETHANY BYRD et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-119-DJH-CHL PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. et al., Defendants. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Bethany Byrd, Sandra Vance, and Destiny Hicks assert that Defendants Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, and Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company improperly denied them personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. (Docket No. 20) Plaintiffs, both individually and as a putative class, filed this action…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API