Legal Opinion

Mitchell Bank v. Schanke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2004No. 01-1590, 01-1591PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJon E Wilcox, J.

¶ 1. This case involves two consolidated actions: a foreclosure action and a declaratory judgment action. The parties dispute the validity of a mortgage Mitchell State Street Bank, now known as Mitchell Bank (the Bank), has on certain lands in Genesee, Wisconsin, of which Thomas Schanke (Schanke) owns an undivided one-half interest. Schanke purchased his interest following a previous successful action against Dr. Alfred Waltke (Waltke) to collect on an outstanding debt. Waltke's wife owns the other undivided one-half interest in the disputed property.

¶ 2. On March 7, 2000, Schanke, naming the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics MacHineryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. National Acceptance Co. of America v. Exchange National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. John Miller Supply Co. v. Western State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States v. Christopher JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Santander Consumer USA Inc v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Bononi Ex Rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Zilka v. Bayer Employees Fed. Credit Union (In Re Zilka)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API