Legal Opinion

Santander Consumer USA Inc v. State Treasurer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2018No. 154668; 154669; 154670PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtViviano, J.

**488 Plaintiffs are financing companies that seek tax refunds under Michigan's bad-debt statute, MCL 205.54i, for taxes paid on vehicles financed through installment contracts. Defendant Department of Treasury (the Department) denied the refund claims on three grounds: (1) MCL 205.54i excludes debts associated with repossessed property, (2) plaintiffs failed to provide RD-108 forms evidencing their refund claims, and (3) the election forms provided by plaintiff Ally Financial Inc. (Ally), by their terms, did not apply to the debts for which Ally sought tax refunds. The Court of Claims and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bank of America Na v. First American Title Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Cannarbor Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Capital One Na v. State TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Debra K Andreson v. Progressive Michigan Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Dock Farish v. Department of Talent and Economic DevelopmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API