Legal Opinion

A A Tube Testing Co. v. Sohne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 1964PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for allegedly inducing five of plaintiff’s customers to breach their respective contracts with plaintiff, the plaintiff appeals from an order of .the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 28, 1963, which: (1) granted defendants’ motion to dismiss as patently insufficient (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4; now CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 7) each of the five causes of action pleaded in the complaint; and (2) granted plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint within a specified time. Order affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff’s time to serve an amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potter v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Potter v. GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Kolbeck v. LIT America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. Medtech Products Inc. v. RANIR, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. LinkCo, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API