Legal Opinion
Brandt v. Griffin
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided August 30, 2022No. 4:21-cv-00450Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION DYLAN BRANDT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. 4:21CV00450 JM LESLIE RUTLEDGE, ET AL DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending are the Plaintiffs’ motions to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Patrick W. Lappert and Dr. Mark Regnerus and Defendants’ motion in limine. The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for consideration. 1. Daubert motions Rule 702 imposes on the trial judge the gatekeeping responsibility of determining that expert testimony evidence is both relevant and reliable. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc.,
509 U.S.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Palmore v. SidotiSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Katie Bonner, Esau Bonner v. Isp Technologies, Inc., Crawford & Company, Inc., MovantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.