Legal Opinion
Katie Bonner, Esau Bonner v. Isp Technologies, Inc., Crawford & Company, Inc., Movant
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 3, 2001No. 00-3458PublishedCited by 342 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Judge.
ISP Technologies, Inc. (ISP) appeals the judgment entered by the district court 2 on a jury verdict against it for damages sustained by Katie Bonner. We affirm.
I
Taking the facts in the light most favorable to the verdict, Katie Bonner was twice exposed to FoamFlush, an organic solvent manufactured by ISP, during her employment on an assembly line in a urethane filter production plant. In March of 1995, the solvent partially dissolved a neoprene hose near Bonner’s work station and sprayed over her in a dense mist. In July of 1995, FoamFlush vapors were released from a drum…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Carol Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Rita A. Hogan v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by342 opinions
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Zurn Pex Plumbing Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Cole v. Homier Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
337 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.