Legal Opinion

Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. E. E. Cloer General Contractor, Inc., and United States Guarantee Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1954No. 15104_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

We have here for consideration the question whether that type of surety bond that is generally known as a performance bond, which is conditioned on the faithful performance of the principal contract requiring that the principal “furnish all materials and perform all work as described etc.,” but failing to state affirmatively that the contractor will pay for the materials so furnished, requires that such surety stand responsible for the payment of materials admittedly used in furtherance of the contract.

This case is here on appeal from a judgment given by the trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Knox, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Florida Ex Rel. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Wesley Construction Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1970
  3. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  4. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Brezina Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co. v. Scherer, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API