Legal Opinion
Martin v. Home Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 31, 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
In 1972, the Legislature enacted a no-fault automobile insurance scheme. L. 1972, c. 70. The New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No-Fault Law), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35, requires that every private-passenger automobile registered in New Jersey be insured under a policy containing personal-injury-protection (PIP) benefits. PIP benefits are designed to cover certain basic expenses incurred in automobile accidents by the occupants of an insured vehicle, the members of each car owner’s family, and, in certain instances, pedestrians. At…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Roig v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Wollen v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Licensed Beverage Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Jimenez v. BaglieriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Cooper Hospital University v. Prudential InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- KATHLEEN LEGGETTE VS. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCECOMPANY (GEICO)(L-1585-14, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.