Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Baglieri

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 29, 1998PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

This appeal presents the issue of whether individuals injured by hit-and-run motorists must satisfy the verbal threshold pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(n), to recover noneconomic damages from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Fund or UCJF). We conclude the Legislature intended that claimants injured in hit- and-run accidents must satisfy the verbal threshold to recover noneconomic damages from the Fund.

I

On July 2, 1991, while on her way to work, plaintiff Jesenia Jimenez was struck by a car. The car slowed momentarily, allowing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Roig v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Zabilowicz v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. James v. TorresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Gallo v. Mayor and Tp. CouncilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Jefferson Street Condominium Ass'n v. PaigeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API