Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Bell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1915No. 19,602PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Finney district court; George J. Downer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was a mortgage foreclosure case. The words “payable annually” were omitted from the note. By the terms of the note the makers promised to pay the principal five years after date with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum from date. It provided:

“The right is hereby reserved to pay $100.00 or any multiple thereof at any interest paying period, provided 30 days’ notice is given.”

The mortgage provided:

“And if the taxes and assessments of every nature which are or may be assessed and levied against said premises, or any part…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Busenbark v. BusenbarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Williams v. WesselsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Rose v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Ohio Investment Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamblin v. MarchantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Hayes v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Lukomske v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API