Legal Opinion

Lukomske v. Harris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1936No. 32,823PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This was a foreclosure action, and it involves the question of whether the provision in the mortgage promising to pay the taxes, and if not paid, authorizing the mortgagees to pay them and recover the same with interest, is an obligation for an unconditional payment of money.

R. S. 60-729 requires that—

“. . . In all actions founded on written instruments for the unconditional payment of money . . . the answer shall be verified by the defendant, his agent or attorney.”

The petition is in the usual form, attaching a copy of the note and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Hamson v. BabbittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. National Bond & Investment Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Stinson v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Black v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cook v. DonnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Smith v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. KIMEL v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API