Hamblin v. Marchant
Supreme Court of Kansas
OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Montgomery district court; Charles D. Shu-KERS, judge pro tem.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
An opinion was rendered in this action on October 12, 1918. (Hamblin v. Marchant, 103 Kan. 508, 175 Pac. 678.) A rehearing was granted. The defendant insistently argues that section 3856 of the General ‘Statutes of 1915 is unconstitutional, in that it works a forfeiture of a wife’s rights in her husband’s property when she survives him and is convicted of killing him. Homestead rights do not appear to be involved, at least they are not argued. The defendant’s argument is largely based on the declarations of this court concerning the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Warburton v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Arnett v. ReadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Busenbark v. BusenbarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Hamblin v. MarchantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Trust Co. v. PykeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Lore v. HabermeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re Estate of FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Rosenberger v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1960
- In Re Estate of KalfusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.