Legal Opinion
Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. California
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 15, 2001No. Nos. C 97-04693, C 98-01806 CWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING COYOTE VALLEY’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 25 U.S.C. §§ 2710(d)(7)(B)(iii) and (iv)
WILKEN, District Judge.
This complaint was filed pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721. Plaintiff Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians (Coyote Valley) moves for an order requiring Defendant State of California to negotiate with it pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(B)(iii) and (iv). The State opposes the motion. A hearing on the motion was held on February 25, 2000. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Indian Gaming Related CasesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010