Legal Opinion
South Dakota v. Goldschmidt
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 12, 1980No. Nos. 80-1358, 80-1359PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The State of South Dakota (the State) appeals two adverse decisions of the district court which held that the Highway Beautification Act, 23 U.S.C. § 131 (1965) (the Act) is constitutional1 and that the Secretary of Transportation was authorized by the Act to withhold ten percent of the State’s apportionment of 1978 federal highway funds as a penalty for the State’s failure to institute effective control of billboards.2 We affirm based on the comprehensive opinions of the district court, however, we review the history of the litigation leading to these appeals for purposes of clarification.
Beg…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Dakota v. VolpeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1973
- Hogen v. South Dakota State Board of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State of Nebraska, Department of Roads v. Norbert T. Tiemann, Federal Highway AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- South Dakota v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1980
- South Dakota v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of South Dakota v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., in Her Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Missouri v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996
- State Of South Dakota v. Neil GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State of Mo. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996