Legal Opinion

Missouri v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided February 5, 1996No. 4:94CV01288PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FILIPPINE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits following trial to the Court. After consideration of the pleadings, the testimony and exhibits introduced at trial, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, the Court enters the following memorandum which it adopts as its findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Plaintiffs filed suit challenging the constitutionality of two sanctions provisions of the 1990…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Mo. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API