Legal Opinion

Hogen v. South Dakota State Board of Transportation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1976No. 11877PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINANS, Justice.

This is an action under the Uniform Declaration Judgment Act, SDCL 21-24. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the Highway Beautification and Regulation of Advertising Act, SDCL 31-29, is unconstitutional and ask for injunctive relief against its enforcement. In the alternative plaintiffs seek a declaration of the damages to *495which they are entitled under the Act. The trial court found the statute to be constitutional in all aspects challenged, denied in-junctive relief, and held that plaintiffs were entitled to “just compensation” as the proper measure of damages. We reverse.

Plai…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Schryver v. SchirmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. SEALE v. McKennonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. City of Sioux Falls v. Sioux Falls Firefighters, Local 814South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. MoschellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API