Brooks v. Coyle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Kephart,
In 1914 Fischer, an independent insurance broker and sole owner of his business, associated himself with an insurance broker, Robert M. Coyle & Co., for their mutual benefit. He had the personal confidence of a list of clients. Under the agreement Coyle was to take care of the business; in case of permanent disability or on his death it was to be taken care of for his widow.
The only part of the arrangement which it is necessary to consider is “either party being permitted to withdraw from this agreement on thirty days’ notice to the other.” Fischer died in 1915…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hober's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Beckman v. Altoona Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- McCollum v. Braddock Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Buscaglia v. District Court of San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
- Derringer v. DerringerPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.