Legal Opinion

Hober's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1935No. Appeal, 213PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This record is not in very good shape, due to the fact that the case was set down for argument in the court below, by the petitioner, the appellant, on bill and answer, without taking any testimony or depositions. It follows that wherever the averments of the petition are denied in the answer, this court will accept as true the pertinent facts set forth in the answer: Welmet B. & L. Assn. v. Matchica, 310 Pa. 275, 165 A. 227; Hild v. Dunn, 310 Pa. 289, 165 A. 228; Brooks v. Coyle, 319 Pa. 80, 179 A. 81.

The petition and answer are not as full and complete as they might…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Estate of TysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Cutler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Williams' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Earle v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Appeal of the Odd Fellows Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McGovern's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Brown's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Smith's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Matovich v. Gradich Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Hill v. Bank of San PedroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API