Legal Opinion

United States v. Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided June 30, 1965No. A.R.D. 193; Entry No. 13472, etcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Fifty-two appeals to reappraisement have been consolidated for trial. The mechandise consists of a variety of articles, all exported from Japan. The issue, common to all these appeals, is whether ex-factory prices represent the export values of the merchandise.

The trial judge found that export value is the proper basis for valuing all of the articles; that the principal markets were at the factories; that the several invoice prices, as returned, are the ex-factory prices, and that they represent the export values; and that the appraiser erred in adding to such prices certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Kobe Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. United States v. Freedman & Slater, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Kobe Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API