State v. Thornton
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GODFREY, Justice.
By a three-count joint indictment, David Thornton and William Bath were indicted for unlawful trafficking in schedule-X drugs, hashish and mescaline, and a schedule-W drug, amphetamines (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103). A complaint for unlawful furnishing of a schedule-Z drug, marijuana, was also brought. (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1106). A jury found both defendants guilty of trafficking in hashish and amphetamines, furnishing marijuana, and possession of mescaline (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107). The defendants appeal the judgments of conviction entered upon those jury verdicts. We affirm the judgments.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. DrakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. TerrioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. GaudetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.