Legal Opinion

State v. Thornton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

By a three-count joint indictment, David Thornton and William Bath were indicted for unlawful trafficking in schedule-X drugs, hashish and mescaline, and a schedule-W drug, amphetamines (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103). A complaint for unlawful furnishing of a schedule-Z drug, marijuana, was also brought. (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1106). A jury found both defendants guilty of trafficking in hashish and amphetamines, furnishing marijuana, and possession of mescaline (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107). The defendants appeal the judgments of conviction entered upon those jury verdicts. We affirm the judgments.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. State v. DrakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. TerrioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. State v. GaudetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API