State v. Gaudette
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
The defendant, Angus Gaudette, appeals from his conviction for assault, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 207, following a jury trial in Superior Court, Washington County. We set aside the conviction because the defendant’s trial was unfairly tainted by inadmissible testimony.
The defendant represented himself at trial, but has retained counsel for this appeal. It is clear from the record that he was not indigent and that he received more than ample warning of the dangers of proceeding without counsel. The defendant made no objections to any of the testimony at trial and submitted no proposed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. WymanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- State v. VigueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- State v. ReillySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. GoodrichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.