The Florida Bar Ex Rel. Wolf
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Michael Howard Wolf be reinstated to the practice of law in Florida. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. For the reasons stated below, we reject the referee’s recommendation that Wolf be reinstated. Wolf failed to prove rehabilitation by failing to strictly comply with this Court’s suspension order, in that he engaged in the practice of law while under suspension. He has also failed to prove rehabilitation by continuing to demonstrate financial irresponsibility, the character flaw that caused or greatly contributed to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- The Florida Bar v. RiggsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- The Florida Bar v. WolfSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Florida Bar ex rel. McGrawSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Florida Bar Re: Brian John MurthaSupreme Court of Florida · 2021