Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Wolf
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 23, 2006No. SC04-1374PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
930 So.2d 574 (2006)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Michael Howard WOLF, Respondent.
No. SC04-1374.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 23, 2006.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 2006.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, and Michael David Soifer, Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Complainant.
Kevin P. Tynan of Richardson and Tynan, P.L.C., Tamarac, FL, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Michael Howard Wolf. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla.…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. TravisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. HeckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- The Florida Bar v. TillmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. Martinez-GenovaSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Florida Bar v. IrishSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Florida Bar v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- The Florida Bar Ex Rel. WolfSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- The Florida Bar v. Alejandro L. MarriagaSupreme Court of Florida · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.