Legal Opinion

Deibert v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 1926PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

The appellant, Arthur Gr. Deibert, was convicted of obtaining money by false pretense, and his appeal presents ■eleven exceptions on the evidence, and an exception to the refusal to quash the indictment. The traverser was indicted under section 139 of article 21 of Bagby’s Code, which declares that “any person who shall by any false pretense obtain from any other person any chattel, money or valuable security, with intent to defraud any person of the same, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor * * * provided also-, that a mere promise for future payment, though not intended to be performed, shall…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  2. Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Luery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  4. Dick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Berger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. State v. Devers and WebsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Samson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API