Bloomer v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The exceptions, eight in number, are sufficiently set out in the opinion. A verdict of guilty was rendered against the traverser, William E. Bloomer, hut as to the traverser, Upton W. Dorsey, the jury being unable to agree, were discharged. The traverser, Bloomer, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBowie, J.
The appellant, William E. Bloomer, and Upton W. Dorsey, were indicted in the Criminal Court of the City of Baltimore, for conspiracy with others whose names are unknown, to cheat and defraud the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, etc.
*526The first count charged, that being in possession of certain cards or tickets of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, which contained blank spaces for filling in or writing the name of the person to whom they might have been properly issued and granted, they, together with others unknown, conspired and agreed to fraudulently fill in and insert…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- McAleer v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Lanasa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.