Legal Opinion
Markle Interests, LLC v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 22, 2014No. Civil Action Nos. 13-234, 13-362, 13-413PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*748 ORDER AND REASONS
MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN, District Judge.
These consolidated proceedings ask whether a federal government agency’s inclusion of a privately-owned tree farm in its final designation of critical habitat for the dusky gopher frog, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, was arbitrary or capricious. Before the Court are' 11 motions, including nine cross-motions for summary judgment:(1) Weyerhaeuser Company’s motion for summary judgment, (2) the federal defendants’ cross-motion, and (3) the inter-venor defendants’ cross-motion; (4) Markle Interests LLC’s motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. U.S. Fish and WCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.