Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 27, 2018No. 17–71PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts

The Endangered Species Act directs the Secretary of the Interior, upon listing a species as endangered, to also designate the "critical habitat" of the species. A group of landowners whose property was designated as critical habitat for an endangered frog challenged the designation. The landowners urge that their land cannot be critical habitat because it is not habitat, which they contend refers only to areas where the frog could currently survive. The court below ruled that the Act imposed no such limitation on the scope of critical habitat.

The Act also authorizes the Secretary to exclude…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Guerrero-Lasprilla v. BarrSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API