Legal Opinion
Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 28, 2007No. 96-760CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORN, Judge.
The court is in receipt of plaintiffs February 14, 2007 motion to compel the deposition testimony of Darleen Druyun, a former government employee with an inactive security clearance, who has been denied Tri-Service Stand-Off Attack Missile (TSSAM) program access. The plaintiff seeks to solicit testimony from Ms. Druyun utilizing unclassified documents, declassified documents, unclassified redacted versions of classified documents, and classified documents authored or received by Ms. Druyun during her federal employment regarding the TSSAM program, the subject of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dorfmont v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rayburn F. HESSE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- United States v. PoindexterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Cheney v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016