Legal Opinion

Schollhorn Co. v. Workers Int. Union

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 13, 1946No. File No. 36572PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff corporation in this action is seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from causing and directing "large and unreasonable numbers of persons to congregate and remain on the public pavement and highway directly in front of the plaintiff's premises . . . in interference with the conduct of the business" and preventing employees, "customers and suppliers of the plaintiff, and other persons, all having a legal right to enter . . . for the purpose of working for, . . . placing orders with, . . . [or] furnishing services and transacting other legitimate business,"…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Levy & Devaney, Inc. v. International Pocketbook Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Eastwood-Nealley Corp. v. Int'l, C., Dist. 47New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Connecticut State Employees Ass'n v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Anaconda Co. v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
  4. Bruno v. Bbc Corporation, No. Cv00 07 16 34 (Jan. 23, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API