Legal Opinion

Layne v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1912No. Civ. No. 1002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. T. L. Lewis, Judge. The facts are stated in the-opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

This is an action to quiet title brought by the administrator of the estate of J. H. A. Bartels; deceased, and his heirs at law, against Thomas J. Johnson, city of San Diego, a municipal corporation, and A. .G. Robinson. The complaint- is in the usual form, and alleges the appointment of Layne, as administrator of the estate of Bartels, on the 10th of November, 1905, by the superior court of San Diego county. The answer does not deny the allegation in reference to' the appointment and qualification of Layne as administrator, but does deny that the other plaintiff's are the heirs at law of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Galvin v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ballerino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Board of Library Trustees v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API