Galvin v. Palmer
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a motion for a writ of execution and refusing to vacate the judgment and stay the execution. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
A judgment was rendered by the superior court in the above-entitled cause, May 3, 1893, declaring the defendant to he the owner in fee and entitled to the immediate possession of certain real property in San Francisco, and that he recover possession of the same from the plaintiffs, and each of them. A new trial was afterwards granted by said court, and upon an appeal therefrom to this court, that order was reversed, and a remittitur issued to the superior court, June 27, 1896. (Galvin v. Palmer, 113 Cal. 46.) A writ of error after-wards issued thereon-to this court, out of the supreme court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Paige v. RoedingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Haese v. HeitzegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.