Legal Opinion
PEREZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3389PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3389 In re Cristobal PEREZ, Respondent File A91 875 147 - Huntsville Decided May 12, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Pursuant to section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(1) (Supp. II 1996), continuous residence or physical presence for cancellation of removal purposes is deemed to end on the date that a qualifying offense has been committed. (2) The period of continuous residence required for relief under section 240A(a) com- mences when the alien has been admitted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Barton v. BarrSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Joaquin Sinotes-Cruz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- JURADOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- Daniel Valencia-Alvarez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.