Legal Opinion
Daniel Valencia-Alvarez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 6, 2006No. 05-70275PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, Daniel Valencia-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks relief from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ determinations that he was removable for having been convicted of a controlled substance offense and that he was ineligible for cancellation of removal because his continuous presence in the United States “stopped” at the time he committed the offense. On appeal, Valencia-Alvarez basically advances two arguments. First, he contends that respondent was barred by res judicata from asserting additional charges after the Board of Immigration Appeals…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Singh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hernandez De Anderson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Michael Herbert Becker v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Camins v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.