Legal Opinion

Peacock v. State Ex Rel. American Mortgage & Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 14, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This was a mandamus proceeding brought in aid of a judgment at law recovered by the defendant in error against the City of South Miami, Florida. From the award of a peremptory writ of mandamus the city has sued out this writ of error. The case is now being considered by this Court on defendant in error’s motion to dismiss the appellate proceedings as frivolous and sued out merely for delay. Section 4639 C. G. L., 2920 R. G. S. Upon consideration of the motion we have concluded to apply the rule laid down in Holtsberg v. McCarty, 117 Fla. 554, 158 Sou. Rep. 123, wherein it was held that where…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DuBoise Construction Co. v. City of South MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Holtsberg v. McCartySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. City of South Miami v. Duboise Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conner v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. City of Miami Beach v. CummingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Cummings v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API