Legal Opinion

Cummings v. City of Miami Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 31, 1972No. 41653PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Justice.

By petition for certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of appeal, Third District (City of Miami Beach v. Cummings, 251 So.2d 715), which allegedly conflicts with a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (Coggan v. Coggan, 183 So.2d 839) on the same point of law. Fla.Const., art. V, § 4, F.S.A.

The facts are stated by the District Court of Appeal, as follows:

“Essentially the point raised is one of procedure. It arose in the following manner: (1) A judgment for attorney’s fees supplemental to a proceeding in eminent domain was entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. AskewSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Coggan v. CogganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. City of Miami Beach v. CummingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Peacock v. State Ex Rel. American Mortgage & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Scharf v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Sands v. GranoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API