Legal Opinion

Holtsberg v. McCarty

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 6, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon motion filed by appellee to dismiss the appeal in this case as frivolous, this Court entered an order that action on the motion to dismiss be postponed until after the briefs were all filed in order that the Court might have the benefit of appellants’ arguments in support ■ of the propriety of the appeal, as against appellee’s motion.

It does not appear that the questions raised and argued are so unfounded and lacking in probable merit that it can be inferred therefrom that the appeal was taken as a frivolous appeal or solely for the purpose of delay. Therefore the motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberts Bros. v. LangfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Green v. CookSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phifer v. PhiferSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. National Surety Corp. v. SholtzSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Gill v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Peacock v. State Ex Rel. American Mortgage & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Clifford v. Eastern Mortgage & Security Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API