Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Hori Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 2, 1931No. 3406Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Bland, Judge:

I must respectfully dissent from the conclusion reached by my associates.

It would seem that there should be no dispute about the proposition that for the merchandise at bar to be dutiable under paragraph 363 as swords, the articles must in fact be swords; that is, they must be swords in fact before the phrase “irrespective of quality or use” can apply. I take the position that toy swords are not swords within the meaning of the paragraph.

The opinion of the majority would seem to indicate that even if the goods were toy swords, they would be dutiable under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API