Legal Opinion

Kasson v. McChesney

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1903No. Sac. No. 998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County denying a new trial. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

—The action in which this appeal is taken is a proceeding to determine heirship under the provisions of section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the estate of 'George M. Kasson, deceased. Said Kasson died September 23, 1895, leaving a will, which was duly admitted to probate November 1, 1895, in the superior court of San Joaquin County.

The proceeding to determine heirship was instituted January 15, 1897, by 'George W. Lindy, who is styled plaintiff. In his petition, or complaint, it was set forth and claimed that he was the only child and heir at law of said George M. Kasson; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mann v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Lindy v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'DAY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Welch v. All PersonsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Flynn v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Hall v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API