Legal Opinion

Lindy v. McChesney

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1901No. Sac. No. 998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from various orders. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeals.

1. The appellant, Mary E. Mann, gave notice to the respondents, February 11, 1901, of her appeal from the order made in the above-entitled proceeding, by which a nonsuit was granted and entered against her, and from the order given and entered therein, by which a default was granted and entered against her, and from the judgment given, and entered therein, in favor of the other defendants and against her. On the same day she filed an undertaking on appeal, in which, after reciting her notice of appeal, the sureties undertook and promised on her behalf that she…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kasson v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Theisen v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants' Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2026
  4. Rattie v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API