Legal Opinion

Hodgson v. Pohl

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 24, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16 N.J. Super. 87 (1951)

83 A.2d 783

MABEL HODGSON AND MABEL B. HODGSON AND JOHN H. HODGSON, EXECUTORS, ETC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

LEROY V. POHL, MARY E. FLUHARTY AND HARRY FLUHARTY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 15, 1951.

Decided October 24, 1951.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Walter S. Keown argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Sidney P. McCord argued the cause for respondent, LeRoy V. Pohl (Messrs. Starr, Summerill and Davis, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel P. Orlando argued…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  2. Murphy v. TerzakoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Title Abstract Co. v. MasburgOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Heinz v. Atlantic Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  5. Wilcox v. Christian and Missionary AllianceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Schaub v. LinehanIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Garfield Trust Co. v. TeichmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Woodhouse v. WoodhouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API