Legal Opinion
Woodhouse v. Woodhouse
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 11, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. Super. 229 (1952)
89 A.2d 707
GENEVIEVE T. WOODHOUSE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
RICHARD P. WOODHOUSE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 26, 1952.
Decided June 11, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FRANCIS.
Mr. Samuel Rochlin argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Charles H. Roemer, attorney).
Mr. John J. Connell argued the cause for defendant-appellant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C.
The parties to this action were married in New Jersey on September 3, 1939, and thereafter lived together here until their…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Staedler v. StaedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Hooker v. HookerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Dennison v. DennisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Morrissey v. MorrisseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woodhouse v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Garfield Trust Co. v. TeichmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Raymond v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Schlemm v. SchlemmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960