Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Terzako
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 23, 1951PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 N.J. Super. 254 (1951)
82 A.2d 1
GEORGE R. MURPHY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
AGNES TERZAKO, AN INFANT, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MAE TERZAKO, MAE TERZAKO, INDIVIDUALLY, AND RALPH GAMBA, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 14, 1951.
Decided May 23, 1951.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and Wm. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McKeown, Schreiber & Lancaster, attorneys).
Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr., argued the cause for respondents, Terzako (Messrs. Lahey & Gockeler,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Smith v. Red Top Taxicab Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Ochs v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Batts v. Joseph Newman, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Gelsmine v. VignaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lanzet v. GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Dalton v. GesserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Moore v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Phillips v. ScrimenteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Cermak v. Hertz Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.