Legal Opinion
State v. Tanzymore
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1959No. 34554PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The assignments of error upon this appeal from a conviction of second-degree assault are:
‘T. The court erred in not allowing appellant’s requested instructive No. 9.
“2. Substantial justice was denied the appellant in the lower court.. “3. The appellant did not have a fair trial because of the prejudicial testimony of police officers called by the State.”
Appellant’s requested instruction No. 9 is as follows:
“The burden is upon the State to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty. All of the jurors must be satisfied of his ghilt beyond a reasonable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. LintonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. WhetstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. SparrWashington Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by40 opinions
- Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.