Legal Opinion

State v. Sparr

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1951No. 31758PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged with the crime of grand larceny. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict of guilty and this appeal followed.

There are two assignments of error on appeal:

1. That the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial for the reason that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence in that the value of the motors, which were the subject of the larceny, was not established to be great enough at the time of the theft to make the larceny the crime of grand larceny;

2. That the court erred in admitting plaintiff’s exhibits “R” and “S”.

The first assignment of error is…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TanzymoreWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. FarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API