Legal Opinion

Cornelius Martin, II v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 7, 2008No. 07-14053UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-Appellant Cornelius Martin, II, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint, which raised claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Martin’s allegation of poverty was untrue, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A). No reversible error has been shown; we affirm.

Martin’s FTCA claim stemmed from an injury he received when he tripped on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Evans v. CroomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  3. Jerry Larry Collier v. Sergeant Tatum, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Camp v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Floyd v. LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Abbott v. Chatham County JailDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
  3. Brown v. CookDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  4. Brown v. CookDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  5. Brown v. RuizDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API