Legal Opinion

Evans v. Croom

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1981No. Nos. 80-6331, 80-6352, 80-6355, 80-6393 and 80-6395PublishedCited by 263 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs, all state prisoners, appeal the dismissal of their pro se § 1983, 42 U.S.C. actions against the officials at the prison where they are incarcerated. In all the actions, the plaintiffs, by affidavit sought under § 1915(a), 28 U.S.C., authority to commence and prosecute their actions as indigents, relieved of any obligation to pay filing fees.

Before the actions were filed, the District Court had promulgated an order permitting a tentative filing of any § 1983 action by a state prisoner whenever the affidavit in support of the pro forma pauperis motion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. Boyce v. AlizaduhCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  4. Kenneth Souder v. Michael McGuire Superintendent, Farview State Hospital, Waymart, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Graham v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by263 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Taylor v. Delatoore, Deputy Huges, Deputy Unknown Duncan, Sgt. Rogers, Lt. Eriquez, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Lee Hampton v. Ron HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Cochran v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. Olivares v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API