Legal Opinion

Petto v. the Raymond Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1988No. Docket 97795PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the Allegan Circuit Court’s judgment of directed verdict in favor of defendant.

This is a products liability action. Plaintiff tore a ligament in his left knee while operating an electric hi-lo manufactured by defendant. Plaintiff testified that he sustained his injury when the hi-lo’s brake failed to function properly while he was on an incline. Petto tried to stop the hi-lo by turning it into a wall. Petto stuck his leg out just before the machine hit the wall, causing it to be pinned between the hi-lo and the cement wall, resulting in his injury and pain.

Pl…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bouwman v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF AZ. v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. In Re DeerenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Cincinnati, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Fisher v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Gawenda v. Werner Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  4. Zettle v. Handy Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Westphal v. American Honda Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API